Crucial Ballistix 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 vs G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL36
The Crucial Ballistix 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 leads on gaming, scoring 86.5 — about 6% ahead of the G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL36. For gaming the Crucial Ballistix 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 is the clear call: it's both faster and better value in that segment. For 3D modelling the G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL36 is the clear call: it's both faster and better value in that segment. On today's street prices the Crucial Ballistix 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 is the cheaper of the two: the G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL36 costs around 41% more. The Crucial Ballistix 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 wins outright: faster and better value.
| Ballistix 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL16Crucialour pick | Trident Z5 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL36G.Skill | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance scores | ||
| Gaming | 86.5 ★ | 81.6 |
| 3D Modelling | 52.3 | 73.7 ★ |
| AI | 51.7 | 71 ★ |
| VR | 86.5 ★ | 81.6 |
| Value scores | ||
| Gaming | 96.3 ★ | 64.6 |
| 3D Modelling | 58.2 | 58.4 ★ |
| AI | 57.5 ★ | 56.2 |
| VR | 96.3 ★ | 64.6 |
| Specifications | ||
| UserBenchmark Speed | 108 | 178 ★ |
| Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Speed | 3600 MT/s | 6000 MT/s ★ |
| CAS Latency | 16 CL ★ | 36 CL |
| Bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 96 GB/s ★ |
| RRP | €147 | €147 |
★ marks the winner on each row (for TDP, latency and price, lower is better). Ties unmarked. Scores are our own absolute figures; specs and prices are facts from their sources.
Ballistix 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 full specs →Trident Z5 RGB 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-6000 CL36 full specs →See the full ranking →