Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 vs G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16
The G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 leads on gaming, scoring 82.7 — about 5% ahead of the Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16. For 3D modelling the G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 is the clear call: it's both faster and better value in that segment. The G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 comes out ahead in 4 of the 4 uses we score. On today's street prices the Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 is the cheaper of the two: the G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 costs around 16% more. The G.Skill Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 wins outright: faster and better value.
| Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16Corsair | Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16G.Skillour pick | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance scores | ||
| Gaming | 79 | 82.7 ★ |
| 3D Modelling | 38.6 | 42.3 ★ |
| AI | 37.1 | 40.4 ★ |
| VR | 79 | 82.7 ★ |
| Value scores | ||
| Gaming | 234.4 | 239.3 ★ |
| 3D Modelling | 114.5 | 122.4 ★ |
| AI | 110.1 | 116.9 ★ |
| VR | 234.4 | 239.3 ★ |
| Specifications | ||
| UserBenchmark Speed | 94.5 | 108 ★ |
| Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Speed | 3200 MT/s | 3600 MT/s ★ |
| CAS Latency | 16 CL | 16 CL |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s ★ |
| RRP | €69 ★ | €83 |
★ marks the winner on each row (for TDP, latency and price, lower is better). Ties unmarked. Scores are our own absolute figures; specs and prices are facts from their sources.
Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 full specs →Ripjaws V 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 full specs →See the full ranking →