Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-2666 CL16 vs TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL18
The TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 leads on gaming, scoring 76.2 — about 1% ahead of the Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-2666 CL16. For 3D modelling the TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 is the clear call: it's both faster and better value in that segment. The TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 comes out ahead in 4 of the 4 uses we score. On today's street prices the TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 is the cheaper of the two: the Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-2666 CL16 costs around 23% more. The TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 wins outright: faster and better value.
| HyperX Fury 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-2666 CL16Kingston | T-Force Vulcan Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL18TeamGroupour pick | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance scores | ||
| Gaming | 75.2 | 76.2 ★ |
| 3D Modelling | 34.6 | 41.3 ★ |
| AI | 33.5 | 39.4 ★ |
| VR | 75.2 | 76.2 ★ |
| Value scores | ||
| Gaming | 119.1 | 149.2 ★ |
| 3D Modelling | 54.8 | 80.8 ★ |
| AI | 53.1 | 77.1 ★ |
| VR | 119.1 | 149.2 ★ |
| Specifications | ||
| UserBenchmark Speed | 87.9 | 95.4 ★ |
| Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Speed | 2666 MT/s | 3600 MT/s ★ |
| CAS Latency | 16 CL ★ | 18 CL |
| Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s ★ |
| RRP | €74 | €60 ★ |
★ marks the winner on each row (for TDP, latency and price, lower is better). Ties unmarked. Scores are our own absolute figures; specs and prices are facts from their sources.
HyperX Fury 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-2666 CL16 full specs →T-Force Vulcan Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 full specs →See the full ranking →