G.Skill Trident Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL14 vs ADATA ADATA Xpg Lancer 32GB DDR5-6400 CL32
The ADATA ADATA Xpg Lancer 32GB DDR5-6400 CL32 leads on gaming, scoring 91 — about 4% ahead of the G.Skill Trident Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL14. For 3D modelling the ADATA ADATA Xpg Lancer 32GB DDR5-6400 CL32 is the clear call: it's both faster and better value in that segment. The ADATA ADATA Xpg Lancer 32GB DDR5-6400 CL32 comes out ahead in 4 of the 4 uses we score. On today's street prices the G.Skill Trident Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL14 is the cheaper of the two: the ADATA ADATA Xpg Lancer 32GB DDR5-6400 CL32 costs around 12% more. For bang for your buck, the G.Skill Trident Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL14 is the stronger value pick. It's a split call: the ADATA ADATA Xpg Lancer 32GB DDR5-6400 CL32 is faster, but the G.Skill Trident Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL14 gives more performance for the money.
| Trident Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL14G.Skill | ADATA Xpg Lancer 32GB DDR5-6400 CL32ADATAour pick | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance scores | ||
| Gaming | 87.9 | 91 ★ |
| 3D Modelling | 40.3 | 77 ★ |
| AI | 38.8 | 73.2 ★ |
| VR | 87.9 | 91 ★ |
| Value scores | ||
| Gaming | 92.8 ★ | 85.4 |
| 3D Modelling | 42.6 | 72.3 ★ |
| AI | 41 | 68.7 ★ |
| VR | 92.8 ★ | 85.4 |
| Specifications | ||
| UserBenchmark Speed | 116 ★ | — |
| Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB ★ |
| Speed | 3200 MT/s | 6400 MT/s ★ |
| CAS Latency | 14 CL ★ | 32 CL |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s ★ |
| RRP | $120 ★ | $135 |
★ marks the winner on each row (for TDP, latency and price, lower is better). Ties unmarked. Scores are our own absolute figures; specs and prices are facts from their sources.
Trident Z 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3200 CL14 full specs →ADATA Xpg Lancer 32GB DDR5-6400 CL32 full specs →See the full ranking →