Kingston Fury Beast 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 vs Kingston Fury Renegade 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-7200 CL38
The Kingston Fury Renegade 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-7200 CL38 leads on gaming, scoring 92.3 — about 2% ahead of the Kingston Fury Beast 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL16. For 3D modelling the Kingston Fury Renegade 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-7200 CL38 is the clear call: it's both faster and better value in that segment. The Kingston Fury Renegade 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-7200 CL38 comes out ahead in 4 of the 4 uses we score. On today's street prices the Kingston Fury Beast 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 is the cheaper of the two: the Kingston Fury Renegade 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-7200 CL38 costs around 17% more. For bang for your buck, the Kingston Fury Beast 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 is the stronger value pick. It's a split call: the Kingston Fury Renegade 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-7200 CL38 is faster, but the Kingston Fury Beast 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 gives more performance for the money.
| Fury Beast 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL16Kingston | Fury Renegade 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-7200 CL38Kingstonour pick | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance scores | ||
| Gaming | 90.3 | 92.3 ★ |
| 3D Modelling | 68.6 | 83.5 ★ |
| AI | 70.8 | 78.8 ★ |
| VR | 90.3 | 92.3 ★ |
| Value scores | ||
| Gaming | 58.2 ★ | 50.8 |
| 3D Modelling | 44.2 | 46 ★ |
| AI | 45.7 ★ | 43.4 |
| VR | 58.2 ★ | 50.8 |
| Specifications | ||
| UserBenchmark Speed | 94.5 ★ | — |
| Capacity | 64 GB ★ | 32 GB |
| Speed | 3200 MT/s | 7200 MT/s ★ |
| CAS Latency | 16 CL ★ | 38 CL |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s ★ |
| RRP | £182 | £182 |
★ marks the winner on each row (for TDP, latency and price, lower is better). Ties unmarked. Scores are our own absolute figures; specs and prices are facts from their sources.
Fury Beast 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 full specs →Fury Renegade 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5-7200 CL38 full specs →See the full ranking →